| Our Ironic President, Ironically
            Speaking After the stupendous and horrific explosive collapse of the World
            Trade Center Towers and the accompanying destruction of part
            of the Pentagon, the editor of Vanity Fair famously declared
            that irony was dead. Irony will always be with us, of course,
            along with tragedy, comedy, parody, and, alas, melodrama. It
            is doubly ironic, then, that President Bush's leadership since
            9/11 has pushed irony onto the domestic and international political
            stage to a preposterous degree. How could this be?
 The man himself is a stranger to irony and
            indeed self-consciously so, presenting himself during his campaign
            and to this day as a plain direct straight-shooter from the West
            with no patience for the sissified wits of the East, the Democratic
            Party, Old Europe, and especially the dandified French, who he
            pointed out have no word for entrepreneur. Our president does
            not indulge in irony, he embodies it. The president wants freedom restored to Iraq
            while presiding over a Justice Department that is systematically
            dismantling American civil liberties and seeking federal veto
            power over state initiatives on drugs and euthanasia. He wants
            democracy to spread over the globe behind his armada, while dismissing
            the unprecedented global megaprotest against his planned war
            as a trivial difference of opinion about the character of Saddam
            Hussein. The president is exercised, obsessed even, with the
            horror of weapons of mass destruction after his government has
            ignored and ridiculed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, our prior
            agreements with Russia on missile deployment, UN sponsored conventions
            against biological and chemical weapons, and bipartisan initiatives
            to help Russia secure its nuclear weapons and retrain its nuclear,
            biological, and chemical weapons technicians and scientists. The President, along with the now increasingly
            isolated Tony Blair, has been stridently insisting that Saddam
            and Iraq are the most pressing threat to the United States and
            the world. Yes, that's right, that Iraq - the crushed
            country, surrounded by militant and well-armed Kurds, rich and
            powerful Arab states with world class air forces, and a massive
            Iran. And, oh yes, a country that has been bombed regularly by
            the American and British air forces for the last six years. Appparently Osama Bin Laden is not so much
            of a threat because he is not so easy a target. And those 8000
            plus Al Qaeda terrorists we let escape from Kunduz a year ago
            with their Pakistani ISI and military mentors? Well they are
            certainly dispersed, but many thousand are in the wild west of
            the Afghan-Pakistan border, called by some Pushtunistan,
            backed by a divided Pakistan population with millions of Muslim
            supporters underneath the unsteady hand of General Musharaff
            (known locally as Busharaff). Now there is a place that
            could use some straight shooting no-nonsense Seventh Cavalry
            types, to back up the brave few hundreds of 82nd Airborne and
            other elite American troops on what amounts to guard duty with
            the occasional aggressive probe. And, oh yes, the Pakistani do
            have the atomic bomb and the means to deliver it. Speaking of which, Mr. President, it seems
            that the missile technology the Pakistanis have was traded by
            the North Koreans in order to get some enriched uranium and nuclear
            weapons technology from Pakistan. Of course, North Korea has
            also been supplying Iran and others with missiles, as the Chinese
            have. Could be, as Seymour
            Hersh has surmised, Pakistan/Korea might have done some business
            with Indonesia, another Muslim land like Pakistan, along weapons
            of mass destruction lines. But we digress. It seems the Koreans are hurt because they
            are being dismissed as insignificant threats, when they know
            they certainly put Saddam in the shade. They keep shouting how
            ready they are to use weapons of mass destruction unless we pay
            some attention. The fact is, and it is no secret for the majority
            of the attentive public, that all these lands and people are
            truly threats and they already have access to nuclear weapons.
            And, irony again, our attacking Iraq and ignoring Korea is a
            powerful incentive for every nation on earth who can develop
            nuclear weapons to do so post haste, to deter American aggression. Final irony. According to the chickenhawk
            ideologues, now that Russia has collapsed and while China is
            still working its way up from poverty, America is the unrivaled
            superpower and can do anything it wants. We will establish Democracy
            and Freedom no matter how many people we have to kill and imprison
            indefinitely to do so. It is true that we spend more on weapons
            and armed fighters by far than any other nation and any combination
            of nations even remotely liable to arise. But, alas, unrivaled
            power does not equal unlimited and perpetual power. Right now
            we are not able to go after Al-Qaeda and the North Koreans because
            we are loading up the Persian Gulf and Turkey with outrageous
            overkill. And of course it takes troops on the ground to secure
            whatever targets massive destructive weapons may have hammered
            into initial submission. And the standing survivors, who have
            seen their families and homes incinerated, might they be actually
            willing to die fighting us, with nothing to lose and honor to
            gain? Nah. Let's see. Iraq, then maybe Iran, Syria is
            close, might as well do it. Maybe by then the Japanese and Chinese,
            those traditional allies, will have solved that North Korean
            distraction and perhaps India might hold off Pakistan with their
            nukes until we can get around to, what was it? Pushtunistan!
            right. Osama's bad liver will probably have done him in by then,
            anyway. Cumulative irony: If we don't strike Saddam
            now, we might have even bigger troubles later. Er, but if we
            do go ahead with this elective war, we may well have a truly
            big war, with big armies and opposing nukes, forced upon us even
            sooner - with our resources depleted. Only a chickenhawk would not bother to think
            of the cost in American lives (we know they have not a thought
            for non-American lives). How many body bags will we be willing
            to see coming off military planes all over America? Will we finally
            have to institute a draft? How will we pay
            for it? Dip into the Social Security Trust Fund? Before 9/11 President Bush made no claims
            to foreign policy expertise and indeed reassured his heartland
            constituents that it was time to be humble and not try to change
            the world. After 9/11 the mainstream media, especially the television
            talk people, awarded the President 46 additional IQ points and
            now he is single-handedly taking on the reformation and salvation
            of the world. But we are leaving irony behind and heading
            into tragedy. Besides, if we stay focused on that major baddie
            in all-threatening Baghdad, we won't have to think of these nasty
            nasty things. SUV shopping, anyone? It's the patriotic thing
            to do.   3/01/03      
           |